Management of Pregnancy and Delivery in Patients With Hereditary Angioedema Due to C1 Inhibitor Deficiency.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: There is little information on pregnancy and delivery in patients with hereditary angioedema due to C1 inhibitor deficiency (C1INH-HAE). The aim of this study was to describe the effect of pregnancy and deliveries on symptoms of C1INH-HAE and review the need for and safety of treatments available during the study period. METHODS: Retrospective review using a purpose-designed questionnaire of 61 C1INH-HAE patients from 5 hospitals specialized in the management of HAE in Spain. The outcomes measured were number of pregnancies, changes in symptoms during pregnancy and delivery, mode of delivery, type of anesthesia during delivery, treatments received, and tolerance of treatments. RESULTS: We reviewed 125 full-term pregnancies (89 without a prior diagnosis of C1INH-HAE), 14 miscarriages, and 4 induced abortions. Patients reported an increased frequency of C1INH-HAE symptoms in 59.2% of pregnancies (74/125) and the presence of symptoms throughout pregnancy in 40% (50/125). Prophylactic C1INH-HAE therapy was used during 9 (7.2%) of the 125 pregnancies. Nine patients--in 11 pregnancies (8.8 %)--received treatment for acute attacks. Most deliveries (n=110, 88%) were vaginal. A cesarean section was necessary in 15 cases (12%). Short-term prophylaxis with pdhC1INH was administered before 14 deliveries (11.2 %); 111 deliveries (88.8 %) were performed without premedication and were well tolerated. Anesthesia was used in 51 deliveries (40.8%). CONCLUSIONS: Pregnancy has a variable influence on the clinical expression of C1INH-HAE. Attacks tend to occur more frequently but not to increase in severity. Vaginal delivery was mostly well tolerated. pdhC1INH prophylaxis should be administered prior to cesarean delivery and is also recommended before vaginal delivery if there are additional risk factors. pdhC1INH should always be available in the delivery room.

Management of pregnancy and delivery in patients with hereditary angioedema due to C1 inhibitor deficiency

Background and Objective: There is little information on pregnancy and delivery in patients with hereditary angioedema due to C1 inhibitor deficiency (C1INH-HAE). The aim of this study was to describe the effect of pregnancy and deliveries on symptoms of C1INH-HAE and review the need for and safety of treatments available during the study period. Methods: Retrospective review using a purpose-designed questionnaire of 61 C1INH-HAE patients from 5 hospitals specialized in the management of HAE in Spain. The outcomes measured were number of pregnancies, changes in symptoms during pregnancy and delivery, mode of delivery, type of anesthesia during delivery, treatments received, and tolerance of treatments. Results: We reviewed 125 full-term pregnancies (89 without a prior diagnosis of C1INH-HAE), 14 miscarriages, and 4 induced abortions. Patients reported an increased frequency of C1INH-HAE symptoms in 59.2% of pregnancies (74/125) and the presence of symptoms throughout pregnancy in 40% (50/125). Prophylactic C1INH-HAE therapy was used during 9 (7.2%) of the 125 pregnancies. Nine patients—in 11 pregnancies (8.8 %)—received treatment for acute attacks. Most deliveries (n=110, 88%) were vaginal. A cesarean section was necessary in 15 cases (12%). Short-term prophylaxis with pdhC1INH was administered before 14 deliveries (11.2 %); 111 deliveries (88.8 %) were performed without premedication and were well tolerated. Anesthesia was used in 51 deliveries (40.8%). Conclusions: Pregnancy has a variable influence on the clinical expression of C1INH-HAE. Attacks tend to occur more frequently but not to increase in severity. Vaginal delivery was mostly well tolerated. pdhC1INH prophylaxis should be administered prior to cesarean delivery and is also recommended before vaginal delivery if there are additional risk factors. pdhC1INH should always be available in the delivery room (AU)

Antecedentes y Objetivo: Existe escasa información sobre la evolución del embarazo y el parto en pacientes con angioedema hereditario con déficit de C1 Inhibidor (AEH-C1INH). El objetivo del estudio fue describir el efecto de embarazo y parto en los síntomas de AEH-C1INH y la necesidad y seguridad de las terapias disponibles durante dicho período. Diseño: Revisión retrospectiva de datos registrados en 5 centros hospitalarios españoles expertos en AEH. Pacientes y Métodos: 61 mujeres con diagnóstico de AEH-C1INH antes o después de su(s) embarazo(s). Se rellenó un cuestionario específico. Fue evaluado: número de embarazos, evolución de síntomas de AEH durante embarazo(s) y parto(s), tipo de parto, tipo de anestesia durante el parto, tratamientos recibidos y su tolerancia. Resultados: Se revisaron 125 embarazos a término (en 89 embarazos las pacientes estaban sin diagnosticar de AEH) y 18 abortos. Hubo aumento en la frecuencia de síntomas de AEH en 59,2% de embarazos (74/125) y los síntomas estuvieron presentes a lo largo de todos los trimestres en el 40% (50/125). Se usó tratamiento preventivo en 9 de los 125 embarazos (7,2%). Nueve pacientes -en 11 embarazos- (8,8%) recibieron tratamiento para crisis agudas. 110 partos (88%) fueron vaginales, mientras que 15 (12%) fueron cesáreas. Se usó tratamiento profiláctico con concentrado de C1-Inhibidor (pdhC1INH) antes de 14 partos (11,2%). Se completaron 111 partos (88,8%) sin ningún tipo de premedicación y resultaron bien tolerados. Se usó anestesia en 51 partos (41,6%). Conclusiones: La influencia del embarazo en la expresión clínica de la enfermedad es variable, no obstante las crisis tienden a aumentar en frecuencia pero no en gravedad. El parto vaginal fue habitualmente bien tolerado. El pdhC1INH debe administrarse antes de un parto mediante cesárea y también se recomendaría en caso de parto vaginal si existiera algún factor de riesgo adicional. El pdhC1INH debe estar siempre disponible en la sala de partos (AU)

Consensus statement on the diagnosis, management, and treatment of angioedema mediated by bradykinin. Part II. Treatment, follow-up, and special situations.

BACKGROUND: There are no previous Spanish guidelines or consensus statements on bradykinin-induced angioedema. AIM: To draft a consensus statement on the management and treatment of angioedema mediated by bradykinin in light of currently available scientific evidence and the experience of experts. This statement will serve as a guideline to health professionals. METHODS: The consensus was led by the Spanish Study Group on Bradykinin-Induced Angioedema, a working group of the Spanish Society of Allergology and Clinical Immunology. A review was conducted of scientific papers on different types of bradykinin-induced angioedema (hereditary and acquired angioedema due to C1 inhibitor deficiency, hereditary angioedema related to estrogens, angioedema induced by angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors). Several discussion meetings were held to reach the consensus. RESULTS: Treatment approaches are discussed, and the consensus reached is described. Specific situations are addressed, namely, pregnancy, contraception, travelling, blood donation, and organ transplantation. CONCLUSIONS: A review of and consensus on treatment of bradykinin-induced angioedema is presented.

Consensus statement on the diagnosis, management, and treatment of angioedema mediated by bradykinin. Part I. Classification, epidemiology, pathophysiology, genetics, clinical symptoms, and diagnosis.

BACKGROUND: There are no Spanish guidelines or consensus statement on bradykinin-induced angioedema. AIM: To review the pathophysiology, genetics, and clinical symptoms of the different types of bradykinin-induced angioedema and to draft a consensus statement in light of currently available scientific evidence and the experience of experts. This statement will serve as a guideline to health professionals. METHODS: The consensus was led by the Spanish Study Group on Bradykinin-Induced Angioedema (SGBA), a working group of the Spanish Society of Allergology and Clinical Immunology. A review was conducted of scientific papers on different types of bradykinin-induced angioedema (hereditary and acquired angioedema due to C1 inhibitor deficiency, hereditary angioedema related to estrogens, angioedema induced by angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors). Several discussion meetings of the SGBA were held in Madrid to reach the consensus. RESULTS: The pathophysiology, genetics, and clinical symptoms of the different types of angioedema are reviewed. Diagnostic approaches are discussed and the consensus reached is described. CONCLUSIONS: A review of bradykinin-induced angioedema and a consensus on diagnosis are presented.

Tolerance and short-term effect of a cluster schedule with pollen-extracts quantified in mass-units.

We performed a prospective, multicenter study to assess the tolerance and possible short-term effects of allergen vaccines administered according to a cluster schedule in the months immediately preceding the onset of the pollen season. The study was carried out in eight centers and included 191 patients (children and adults) with allergic respiratory disease due to sensitization to olive tree and/or grass pollen. Of these, 34 patients acted as controls and the remaining patients received immunotherapy administered in the initiation phase according to a cluster schedule of eight doses injected on four visits. After 3 months of treatment, significant differences were found between the two groups in medication consumption (antihistamines in drops and oral formulations: p = 0.045 and p = 0.001, respectively; short-acting beta2-agonist treatments: p = 0.004) and respiratory symptoms (wheezing and coughing: p = 0.035 and 0.014, respectively). The cytokine profile (interleukin [IL]-4, 5, 10 and 2, interferon [IFN-gamma], and tumor necrosis factor [TNF-alpha]) was determined before the start of treatment and at the end of follow-up (4-5 months). Levels of IL-4, 5 and 10 (Th2 profile) decreased while those of IL-2, IFN-gamma, and TNF-alpha (Th1 profile) decreased. These differences were more marked in the active group than in the control group but were not statistically significant. No severe adverse effects were recorded. This study shows that the schedule tested had an acceptable tolerance profile and produced significant changes in symptom and medication scores after a few months of treatment. A double-blind, placebo-controlled study is needed to confirm these results.

Tolerance and short-term effect of a cluster schedule with pollen-extracts quantified in mass-units

We performed a prospective, multicenter study to assess the tolerance and possible short-term effects of allergen vaccines administered according to a cluster schedule in the months immediately preceding the onset of the pollen season. The study was carried out in eight centers and included 191 patients (children and adults) with allergic respiratory disease due to sensitization to olive tree and/or grass pollen. Of these, 34 patients acted as controls and the remaining patients received immunotherapy administered in the initiation phase according to a cluster schedule of eight doses injected on four visits. After 3 months of treatment, significant differences were found between the two groups in medication consumption (antihistamines in drops and oral formulations: p = 0.045 and p = 0.001, respectively; short-acting β2-agonist treatments: p = 0.004) and respiratory symptoms (wheezing and coughing: p = 0.035 and 0.014, respectively). The cytokine profile (interleukin [IL]-4, 5, 10 and 2, interferon [IFN-γ], and tumor necrosis factor [TNF-α]) was determined before the start of treatment and at the end of follow-up (4-5 months). Levels of IL-4, 5 and 10 (Th2 profile) decreased while those of IL-2, IFN-γ, and TNF-α (Th1 profile) decreased. These differences were more marked in the active group than in the control group but were not statistically significant. No severe adverse effects were recorded. This study shows that the schedule tested had an acceptable tolerance profile and produced significant changes in symptom and medication scores after a few months of treatment. A double-blind, placebo-controlled study is needed to confirm these results (AU)

Se ha llevado a cabo un estudio prospectivo y multicéntrico con el objetivo de valorar la tolerancia y posible efecto a corto plazo de las vacunas alergénicas administradas bajo pauta cluster en los meses inmediatamente anteriores al inicio de la estación polínica. El estudio se realizó en 8 centros, incluyéndose un total de 191 pacientes (niños y adultos) con enfermedad alérgica respiratoria por sensibilización a polen de olivo y/o gramíneas. De ellos, 34 actuaron como controles y a los pacientes restantes se les administró inmunoterapia bajo una pauta cluster, en la fase de iniciación, de 8 dosis administradas en 4 visitas. Tras 3 meses de tratamiento, se registraron diferencias significativas entre ambos grupos en el consumo de medicación (antihistamínicos en colirio y orales -p = 0,045 y p = 0,001 respectivamente- y ß2 de corta duración -p = 0,004-) así como en síntomas pulmonares (sibilancias y tos -p = 0,035 y 0,014 respectivamente-). Por otro lado, se determinó el perfil de citocinas (IL-4, 5, 10 y 2, IFN-gamma y TNF-a) de forma previa al inicio del tratamiento y al finalizar el seguimiento (4-5 meses). Se observaron descensos en los niveles de IL-4, 5 y 10 (perfil TH2) y aumento en los valores de IL-2, IFN-gamma y TNF-a (perfil TH1), más marcados en el grupo activo que en el control, sin alcanzar significación estadística. No se registraron efectos adversos severos. Por tanto, podemos observar que la pauta ensayada mostró un adecuado perfil de tolerancia, y tras pocos meses de tratamiento se registraron cambios significativos en la puntuación de síntomas y medicación, siendo necesaria la realización de un estudio con un diseño doble ciego frente a placebo para confirmar los resultados obtenidos (AU)

Prospective safety study of immunotherapy administered in a cluster schedule.

Cluster immunotherapy is becoming an alternative to conventional IT due to its shorter schedule, but the safety of such schedule is still controversial. At present, only few studies assess the risk of immunotherapy in a prospective manner, in well-controlled patients, using the same extract and intending to evaluate a single schedule. The aim of the present study is to evaluate the safety of a cluster immunotherapy administration regimen. A total of 91 outpatients (41 male and 50 female), with a mean age of 25 years old (range: 16-50) were included. Sixty-one patients were diagnosed mild to moderate asthma and 30 rhinoconjunctivitis. Forty-six of the enrolled patients were sensitised to pollen (Lolium perenne and/or Olea europea), 38 to Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus and 7 to Alternaria alternata. Patients received specific immunotherapy following a five-week cluster schedule. It was considered as a preseasonal treatment, that is, it was accomplished before olive and grass initial pollinating months in this area (March--April). A total 1029 injections were administered during the induction phase. Adverse reactions were assessed and classified according to the EAACI criteria. The average number of visits to maximum dose was 6 (range 2-10), and 70 patients (77%) reached the maximum between 5-7 visits. In each of the visits an average of 2 (range 1-3) injections were administered. Eighty-one of the 91 initially enrolled patients (89%) completed the cluster schedule. The total number of reactions were 47 (24 local and 23 systemic). No fatal reactions were observed. Since the total number of administered injections was 1029, the relative frequency of adverse reactions was 4.6% (2.3% local and 2.2% systemic). The percentage of patients affected by systemic reaction was 18% and by local reaction 14%. No relationship can be shown between adverse reactions and gender or disease. However, a clear relationship with the composition of immunotherapy has been shown, with a lower risk of adverse reactions associated with the extract of D. pteronyssinus. The shorter period required to achieve the maintenance dose, with a similar frequency of adverse events, leads to the conclusion that the proposed administration regimen can be an alternative to conventional schedule to increase patient compliance.

Tolerance of a cluster schedule on the treatment of seasonal allergic respiratory disease with pollen extracts quantified in mass units.

In order to evaluate the tolerance of a cluster schedule on specific immunotherapy (SIT), 306 patients were included in a multicenter study. The patients were suffering from rhinoconjunctivitis with/without asthma, caused by sensitization to olive and/or grass pollen. SIT was administered subcutaneously according to a cluster schedule in which the maintenance dose is reached after four visits (3 weeks). The extracts were biologically standardized with major allergens quantified in mass units. Local reactions appeared in 7.2% of the patients and 1.3% of the doses. Systemic reactions (SR) were recorded in 1.2% of the doses administered to 9.5% of the patients. No anaphylactic shock was registered, and all the SR responded fully and rapidly to treatment. There was no difference in SR according to diagnosis or allergen extract used. The majority of SR occurred with the administration of vial of higher concentration (Vial 2: 7 SR (22%), Vial 3: 32 SR (78%), p < 0.05). Of the 32 SR recorded with Vial 3, 13 (41%) were immediate, with no existing association between dose administered and appearance of SR. However, of the 18 delayed SR (56%), 14 occurred after the administration of the first two doses of Vial 3 and four occurred after administration of the second two doses (78% vs 22%, p < 0.05). On the other hand, this regime realized an important saving in cost and time compared to the conventional schedule (1581 fewer doses and 2754 fewer visits were necessary to reach the optimal dose). Considering all these factors, the clinical profile of the proposed regime may be qualified as good. However, future studies are necessary in order to better adjust the schedule to avoid the delayed SR that occurred after the administration of the first two doses of Vial 3.